Publications

Most publications by Dan are listed below and at least recently, most of other lab members. However, we are certainly missing some other pubs done by people in the lab. Student authors (grad and undergrad) when the work was done are shown in bold; postdocs in italics. These include students and postdocs in our lab as well as others.

2021

  • Peterson, M. L., G. Bailes, L. Hendricks, L. Pfeifer-Meister,P. B. Reed, S. D. Bridgham, B. R. Johnson,R. Shriver, E. Waddle, H. Wroton, D. F. Doak, B. A. Roy, W. F. Morris. 2021. Latitudinal gradients in population growth do not reflect demographic responses to climate. Ecological Applications 31. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2242
  • Bakker, V., D. F.Doak, and F. Ferrara. 2021. Understanding extinction risk and resilience in an extremely small population facing climate and ecosystem change Ecosphere 12:e03724
  • Castillo Vardaro, J, J.Bonachela,C. Baker, M. Pinsky, D. F.Doak, R. Pringle, and C. E. Tarnita. 2021. Resource availability and heterogeneity shape the self-organization of regular spatial patterning. Ecology Letters DOI: 10.1111/ele.13822
  • Oldfather, M., M. Koontz, D. F. Doak, and D. Ackerly. 2021. Range Dynamics Mediated by Compensatory Life Stage Responses to Experimental Climate Manipulations. 2021. Ecology Letters 24: 772–780. doi: 10.1111/ele.13693
  • Doak, D. F.,E. Waddle, R. E. Langendorf, A. M. Louthan, N. I. Chardon, R. Dibner, D. Keinath, E. Lombardi, C. Steenbock, R. K. Shriver, C. Linares, M.B. Garcia, W. C.Funk, S. W. Fitzpatrick, W.F. Morris, andM. L. Peterson. 2021.A critical comparison of integral projection and matrix projection models for demographic analysis. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1447

2020​

  • Doak, D. F. 2020. Contribution to remembrances of Michael Soule, Conservation Biology
  • Oro, D. and D. F. Doak. 2020. Breeding transients in capture-recapture modeling and their consequences for local population dynamics. Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72778-x
  • Reed, P.M. Peterson, L. Pfeifer-Meister, W. F. Morris, D. F.Doak, B.; Roy, B.Johnson, G. Bailes, A. Nelson, and S. Bridgham. 2020. Climate manipulations differentially affect plant population dynamics within versus beyond northern range limits. Journal of Ecology DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13494
  • Baker, C. M., J.A Castillo Vardaro, D. F Doak, J. Pansu, J. Puissant, R. M. Pringle, and C. E. Tarnita. 2020.Spatial patterning of soil microbial communities created by African fungus-farming termites. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15585
  • Zonana, D. M., J. M. Gee, M. D. Breed, and D. F. Doak.2020.Dynamic shifts in social network structure and composition within a breeding hybrid population. Journal of Animal Ecology.https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13314
  • Bakker, V., T. S. Sillett, B. Cohen, W. Reisen, D. F. Doak, S. A. Morrison, T. W. Vickers, W. Boyce, M. Hallworth. 2020. Translocation with targeted vaccination is the most effective strategy to protect an island endemic bird threatened by West Nile virus. Diversity and Distributions. DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13109

2019

  • Smith,A. B. et. al. (68 coauthors, including D. F. Doak). 2019. Alternatives to genetic affinity as a context for within-species response to climate.Nature Climate Change9:787–794.
  • Chardon, N. I., S. Pironon,M. L. Peterson, and D. F. Doak. 2019. Incorporating intraspecific variation into species distribution models improves distribution predictions, but cannot predict species traits for a wide-spread plant species. Ecography https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04630.
  • Louthan, A. L., E. Valencia, D. J. Martins, T. Guy, J. Goheen, T. Palmer, and D. F.Doak. 2019. Large mammals generate both top-down effects and extended trophic cascades, mediated through flowers, on floral visitor communities. Journal of Tropical Ecology https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467419000142
  • Peterson, M., W.F. Morris, C. Linares, and D. F. Doak. 2019. Improving structured population models with more realistic representations of non‐normal growth. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.13240
  • Langendorf, R. and D. F. Doak. 2019. Can community structure causally determine dynamics of constituent species? A test using a host-parasite community. American Naturalist
  • Chardon, N.I.,C. Rixen, S. Wipf , and D. F. Doak. 2019. Human trampling disturbance exerts different ecological effects at contrasting elevational range limits. Journal of Applied Ecology.DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13384
  • Zonana, D.M., J. M. Gee, E. S. Bridge, M. D. Breed, and D. F. Doak. 2019. Assortative behavior structures social networks in a quail hybrid zone. American Naturalist
  • Waddle, E., L. Piedrahita, E. Hall, G. Kendziorski, W. F. Morris, M. L. Peterson, and D. F. Doak. 2019. Individual variation in reproductive success contributes to population stability and resilience to climate variation. Ecology.
  • Montero-Serra, I., J. Garrabou, D. F. Doak, J. Ledoux, and C. Linares. 2019. Marine protected areas enhance structural complexity but do not buffer the detrimental consequences of ocean warming for an overexploited precious coral. J. Applied Ecology 56:1063–1074.
  • پԱ,., M. L. Peterson, A. L. Louthan, and D.F. Doak. 2019. Comparative effects of multiple mechanisms conferring stability to isolated populations of a rare endemic plant. Ecological Monographs 89
  • Peterson, M. L., D. F. Doak, and W. F. Morris. 2019. Incorporating local adaptation into forecasts of species’ distribution and abundance under climate change. Global Change Biology.

2018

  • Hall, E. S., L.R. Piedrahita, G. Kendziorski, E. Waddle, D. F. Doak, and M. L. Peterson.Climate and synchrony with conspecifics determine the effects of flowering phenology on reproductive success in Silene acaulis. Arctic, Alpine, and Antarctic Research. 2018.

  • Brodie, J. F., K. H. Redford, andD. F. Doak. 2018. Ecological Function Analysis: Incorporating species roles into conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.

  • Louthan, A.M. andD.F. Doak. 2018. Measurement error of state variables creates substantial bias in results of demographic population models. Ecology https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2455.

  • Chardon, N., S. Wipf, C. Rixen, Christian, A. Beilstein, andD.F. Doak. 2018. Local trampling disturbance effects on alpine plant populations and communities: negative implications for climate change vulnerability. Ecology and Evolution DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4276

  • Montero-Serra, I., C. Linares,D.F. Doak, J. B. Ledoux, and J. Garrabou. 2018. Strong linkages between depth, longevity and demographic stability across marine sessile species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2688

  • Bakker V, Finkelstein M, Doak DF, Young L, VanderWerf E, Arata J, Sievert P, Vanderlip C. In press. The albatross of assessing and managing risk for long-lived pelagic yet terrestrial breeding species.Biological Conservation.

  • Dibner R, Murphy ME, Doak DF. In press. Discrepancies in occupancy and abundance approaches to identifying and protecting habitat for at-risk species.Ecology and Evolution.

2017

  • Irons RD, Harding Scurr A, Rose AP, Hagelin JC, Blake T, Doak DF. 2017. Wind and rain are the primary climate factors driving changing phenology of an aerial insectivore.Proceedings of the Royal Society B284:20170412.
  • Genovart M, Doak DF, Igual JM, Sponza S, Kralj J, Oro D. 2017. Varying demographic impacts of different fisheries on three Mediterranean seabird species.Global Change Biologydoi: 10.1111/gcb.13670.
  • Abbott R, Doak DF,Peterson M. 2017. Portfolio effects, climate change, and the persistence of small populations: analyses on the rare plantSaussurea weberi.Ecology98:1071-1081.
  • Montero-Serra I, Garrabou J, Doak DF, Figuerola L, Hereu B, Ledoux J, Linares C. 2017. Accounting for life-history strategies and timescales in marine restoration.Conservation Lettersdoi: 10.1111/conl.12341.
  • Keinath DA, Doak DF, Hodges KE, Prugh LR, Fagan W, Sekercioglu CH, Buchart SHM, Kauffman M. 2017. A global analysis of traits predicting species sensitivity to habitat fragmentation.Global Ecology and Biogeography26:115-127.

2016

  • Novak M, Yeakel JD, Noble AE, Doak DF, Emmerson M, Estes JA, Jacob U, Tinker MT, Wootton JT. 2016. Characterizing species interactions to understand press perturbations: What is the community matrix?Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics47:409-432.
  • Winchell EW, Anderson RS, Lombardi EM, Doak DF. 2016. Gophers as geomorphic agents in the babyֱapp Front Range subalpine zone.Geomorphology264:41-51.
  • Estes JA, Burdin A, Doak DF. 2016. Sea otters, kelp forests, and the extinction of Steller sea cow.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113:880-885.

2015

  • Louthan AM, Doak DF, Angert AL. 2015. Where and when do species interactions set range limits?Trends in Ecology and Evolution30:780-792.
  • Villellas J, Doak DF, García MB, Morris WF. 2015. Demographic compensation among populations: what is it, how does it arise, and what are its implications?Ecology Letters18:1139-1152.
  • Yandow LH, Chalfoun AD, Doak DF. 2015. Climate tolerances and habitat requirements jointly shape the elevational distribution of the American pika (Ochotona princeps) with implications for climate change effects.PLOS Onedoi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131082.
  • Dibner R, Lombardi E, Doak DF. 2015. An ecological engineer maintains consistent spatial patterning, with implications for community-wide effects.Ecosphere6:art151.
  • Pardo I, Doak DF, García-González R, Gómez D, García MB. 2015. Long-term response of plant communities to herbivore exclusion at high elevation grasslands.Biodiversity and Conservationdoi: 10.1007/s10531-015-0996-3.
  • Raventós J, González E, Mújica E, Doak DF. 2015. Population Viability Analysis of the Epiphytic OrchidDendrophylax lindenii.Biotropica.PDF
  • Doak DF, Himes Boor GK, Bakker VJ, Morris WF,Louthan A, Morrison SA, Stanley A, Crowder L. 2015. Recommendations for Improving Recovery Criteria under the US Endangered Species Act.Bioscience65:189-99.PDF
  • Pironon S, Villellas J, Morris WF, Doak DF, García MB. 2014. Do geographic, climatic or historical ranges differentiate the performance of central versus peripheral populations?Global Ecology and BiogeographyǾ:10.1111/.12263PDF

2014

  • Doak DF,Cutler K.2014. Van Manenet al. doth protest too much: new analyses of the Yellowstone Grizzly population confirm the need to reevaluate past population trends.Conservation Letters7:332–333.
  • Doak DF, Bakker VJ, Goldstein BE, Hale B. 2014. Moving forward with effective goals and methods for conservation: a reply to Marvier and Kareiva.Trends in Ecology and Evolution29:132-133.
  • Doak DF, Morris WF. 2014. Life and Times of Alaska's Tundra Plants: How Long Do They Live, and How Are They Responding to Changing Climate?Alaska Park Science12.
  • Louthan AM, Doak DF, Goheen JR, Palmer TM, Pringle RM. 2014. Mechanisms of plant – plant interactions: concealment from herbivores is more important than abiotic-stress mediation in an African savannah.Proceedings of the Royal Society B281:20132647.
  • Doak DF, Bakker VJ, Goldstein BE, Hale B. 2014. What is the future of conservation?Trends in Ecology & Evolution29, 77–81.

2013

  • Doak DF,Cutler K.2013. Re-evaluating evidence for past population trends and predicted dynamics of Yellowstone grizzly bears.Conservation Letters.
  • Doak DF,Bakker VJ, Vickers W. 2013. Using Population Viability Criteria to Assess Strategies to Minimize Disease Threats for an Endangered Carnivore.Conservation Biology27, 303–314.
  • Loso MG, Doak DF, Anderson RS. 2013. Lichenometric dating of Little Ice Age glacier moraines using explicit demographic models of lichen colonization, growth, and survival.Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography
  • Louthan AM, Doak DF, Goheen JR, Palmer TM, Pringle RM. 2013. Climatic stress mediates the impacts of herbivory on plant population structure and components of individual fitness.Journal of Ecology101, 1074-1083

2012

  • Shriver RK,Cutler K, Doak DF. 2012. Comparative demography of an epiphytic lichen: support for general life history patterns and solutions to common problems in demographic parameter estimation.Oecologia70, 137–146.
  • Finkelstein ME, Doak DF, George D, Burnett J, Brandt J, Church M, Grantham J, Smith DR. 2012. Lead poisoning and the deceptive recovery of the critically endangered California condor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109, 11449–11454.

2011

  • Monson DH, Doak DF, Ballachey BE, Bodkin JL. 2011. Could residual oil from the Exxon Valdez spill create a long-term population “sink” for sea otters in Alaska?Ecological Applications21, 2917–2932.
  • Maclean JE, Goheen JR, Doak DF, Palmer TM, Young TP. 2011. Cryptic herbivores mediate the strength and form of ungulate impacts on a long-lived savanna tree.Ecology92, 1626–1636.
  • Conway-Cranos LL, Doak, DF. 2011. Sampling errors create bias in Markov models for community dynamics: the problem and a method for its solution.Oecologia167, 199–207.
  • Novak M, Wootton JT, Doak DF, Emmerson M, Estes JA, Tinker MT. 2011. Predicting community responses to perturbations in the face of imperfect knowledge and network complexity.Ecology92, 836–846.

2010

  • Mooers AO, Doak DF, Findlay CS, Green DM, Grouios C, Manne LL, Rashvand A, Rudd MA, Whitton J. 2010. Science, Policy, and Species at Risk in Canada.BioScience60, 843–849.

  • Doak DF, Morris WF. 2010. Demographic compensation and tipping points in climate-induced range shifts.Nature467, 959–962.

  • Palmer TM, Doak DF, Stanton ML, Bronstein JL, Kiers ET, Young TP, Goheen JR, Pringle RM. 2010. Synergy of multiple partners, including freeloaders, increases host fitness in a multispecies mutualism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 17234–17239.
  • Pringle RM, Doak DF, Brody AK, Jocqué R, Palmer TM. 2010. Spatial Pattern Enhances Ecosystem Functioning in an African Savanna.PLoS Biololgy8.
  • Fox-Dobbs K, Doak DF, Brody AK, Palmer TM. 2010. Termites create spatial structure and govern ecosystem function by affecting N2 fixation in an East African savanna.Ecology91, 1296–1307.
  • Finkelstein ME, Doak DF,Nakagawa M, Sievert PR, Klavitter J. 2010. Assessment of demographic risk factors and management priorities: impacts on juveniles substantially affect population viability of a long-lived seabird.Animal Conservation13, 148–156.
  • Linares C, Doak DF. 2010. Forecasting the combined effects of disparate disturbances on the persistence of long-lived gorgonians: a case study of Paramuricea clavata.Marine Ecology Progress Series402, 59–68.
  • Brody AK, Palmer TM,Fox-Dobbs K, Doak DF. 2010. Termites, vertebrate herbivores, and the fruiting success of Acacia drepanolobium.Ecology91, 399–407.
  • Wolf SG, Snyder MA, Sydeman WJ, Doak DF, Croll DA. 2010. Predicting population consequences of ocean climate change for an ecosystem sentinel, the seabird Cassin's auklet.Global Change Biology16, 1923–1935.
  • Finkelstein ME, Wolf S, Goldman M, Doak DF, Sievert PR, Balogh G, Hasegawa H. 2010. The anatomy of a (potential) disaster: Volcanoes, behavior, and population viability of the short-tailed albatross (Phoebastria albatrus).Biological Conservation143, 321–331.

2009

  • Estes JA, Doak DF, Springer AM, Williams TM. 2009. Causes and consequences of marine mammal population declines in southwest Alaska: a food-web perspective.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences364, 1647–1658.
  • Bakker VJ, Doak DF. 2009. Population viability management: ecological standards to guide adaptive management for rare species.Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment7, 158–165.
  • Bakker VJ, Doak DF, Roemer GW, Garcelon DK, Coonan TJ, Morrison SA, Lynch C, Ralls K, Shaw R. 2009. Incorporating Ecological Drivers and Uncertainty into a Demographic Population Viability Analysis for the Island Fox.Ecological Monographs79, 77–108.
  • Estes JA, Doak DF, Springer AM, Williams TM, van Vliet GB. 2009. Trend data do support the sequential nature of pinniped and sea otter declines in the North Pacific Ocean, but does it really matter?Marine Mammal Science25, 748–754.

2008

  • Tinker MT, Doak DF, Estes JA. 2008. Using demography and movement behavior to predict range expansion of the southern sea otter.Ecological Applications18, 1781–1794.
  • Doak DF, Estes JA, Halpern BS, Jacob U, Lindberg DR, Lovvorn J, Monson DH, Tinker MT, Williams TM, Wootton JT, Carroll I, Emmerson M, Micheli F, Novak M. 2008. Understanding and predicting ecological dynamics: are major surprises inevitable?Ecology89, 952–961.
  • Morris WF, Pfister CA, Tuljapurkar S, Haridas CV, Boggs CL, Boyce MS, Bruna EM, Chruch DR, Coulson T, Doak DF, Forsyth S, Gaillard JM, Horvitz CC, Kalisz S, Kendall BE, Knight TM, Lee CT, Menges ES. 2008. Longevity can buffer plant and animal populations against changing climatic variability.Ecology89, 19–25.
  • Springer AM, Estes JA, van Vliet GB, Williams TM, Doak DF,Danner EM, Pfister B. 2008. Mammal-eating killer whales, industrial whaling, and the sequential megafaunal collapse in the North Pacific Ocean: A reply to critics of Springer et al. 2003.Marine Mammal Science24, 414–442.
  • Bolger DT, Newmark WD, Morrison TA, Doak DF. 2008. The need for integrative approaches to understand and conserve migratory ungulates.Ecology Letters11, 63-77.

2007

  • Linares C, Doak DF, Coma R, Díaz D, Zabala M. 2007. Life history and viability of a long-lived marine invertebrate: the octocoral Paramuricea clavata.Ecology88, 918–928.
  • Agrawal AA, Ackerly DD, Adler F, Arnold AE, Cáceres C, Doak DF, Post E, Hudson PJ, Maron J, Mooney KA, Power M, Schemske D, Stachowicz J, Strauss S, Turner MG, Werner E. 2007. Filling Key Gaps in Population and Community Ecology.Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment5, 145–152.
  • Doak DF,Bakker V,Finkelstein M, Sullivan B, Lewison R, Keitt B, Arnold J, Croxall J, Micheli F, Sanjayan M. 2007. Compensatory mitigation for marine bycatch will do harm, not good.Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment5, 350–351.

2006

  • Tinker MT, Doak DF, Estes JA, Hatfield BB, Staedler MM, Bodkin JL. 2006. Incorporating Diverse Data and Realistic Complexity into Demographic Estimation Procedures for Sea Otters.Ecological Applications16, 2293–2312.
  • Elderd BD, Doak DF. 2006. Comparing the direct and community-mediated effects of disturbance on plant population dynamics: flooding, herbivory and Mimulus guttatus.Journal of Ecology94, 656–669.
  • Inouye BD, Underwood N, Doak DF, Kareiva P. 2006. Interviewing for Academic Jobs.Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America87, 155–158.
  • Gross K, Morris WF, Wolosin MS, Doak DF. 2006. Modeling vital rates improves estimation of population projection matrices.Population Ecology48, 79–89.

2005

  • Loso MG, Doak DF. 2005. The biology behind lichenometric dating curves.Oecologia147, 223–229.
  • Donlan CJ,Knowlton J, Doak DF, Biavaschi N. 2005. Nested communities, invasive species and Holocene extinctions: evaluating the power of a potential conservation tool.Oecologia145, 475–485.
  • Doak DF, Morris WF, Pfister C, Kendall BE, Bruna EM. 2005. Correctly estimating how environmental stochasticity influences fitness and population growth.The American Naturalist166, E14-21.
  • Doak DF, Gross K, Morris WF. 2005. Understanding and predicting the effects of sparse data on demographic analyses.Ecology86, 1154–1163.

2004

  • Forbis TA, Doak DF. 2004. Seedling establishment and life history trade-offs in alpine plants.American Journal of Botany91, 1147–1153.
  • Morris WF, Doak DF. 2004. Buffering of life histories against environmental stochasticity: accounting for a spurious correlation between the variabilities of vital rates and their contributions to fitness.The American Naturalist, 163, 579–590.
  • Doak DF,Loso MG. 2004. Effects of grizzly bear digging on alpine plant community structure.Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research35, 421–428.
  • Gerber LR,Tinker MT, Doak DF, Estes JA, Jessup DA. 2004. Mortality sensitivity in life-stage simulation analysis: a case study of southern sea otters.Ecological Applications14, 1554–1565.
  • Forde SE, Doak DF. 2004. Multitrophic interactions mediate recruitment variability in a rocky intertidal community.Marine Ecology Progress Series275, 33–45.
  • Estes JA,Danner EM, Doak DF, Konar B, Springer AM, Steinberg PD, Tinker MT, Williams TM. 2004. Complex trophic interactions in kelp forest ecosystems.Bulletin of Marine Science74, 621–638.

2003

  • Springer AM, Estes JA, van Vliet GB, Williams TM, Doak DF,Danner EM, Forney KA, Pfister B. 2003. Sequential megafaunal collapse in the North Pacific Ocean: an ongoing legacy of industrial whaling?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 12223–12228.
  • Elderd BD,Shahani P, Doak DF. 2003. The Problems and Potential of Count-Based Population Viability Analyses. In CA Brigham & MW Schwartz (Eds.), Population Viability in Plants (pp. 173–201). Springer.
  • Doak DF, Marvier M. 2003. Predicting the Effects of Species Loss on Community Stability. In P Kareiva & S Levin (Eds.), The Importance of Species (pp. 140–160). Princeton University Press.

1991-2002

  • Doak DF,Thomson D,Jules ES. 2002. Population Viability Analysis for Plants: Understanding the Demographic Consequences of Seed Banks for Population Health. In SR Beissinger & DR McCullough (Eds.), Population Viability Analysis (pp. 312–337). The University of Chicago Press.
  • Doak DF. 2001. Review: The Long-Awaited Sourcebook Arrives.Conservation Biology15, 1825–1826.
  • Harding EK, Doak DF, Albertson JD. 2001. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Predator Control: the Non‐Native Red Fox as a Case Study.Conservation Biology15, 1114–1122.
  • Crone EE, Doak D, Pokki J. 2001. Ecological influences on the dynamics of a field vole metapopulation.Ecology82, 831–843.
  • Monson DH, Doak DF, Ballachey BE, Johnson A, Bodkin JL. 2000. Long-term impacts of the Exxon Valdez oil spill on sea otters, assessed through age-dependent mortality patterns.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America97, 6562–6567.
  • Morris WF, Doak DF, Groom M, Kareiva P. 1999. A practical handbook for population viability analysis (pp. 1–141). The Nature Conservancy.
  • Mills LS, Doak DF, Wisdom MJ. 1999. Reliability of conservation actions based on elasticity analysis of matrix models.Conservation Biology13, 815–829.
  • Kluse J, Doak DF. 1999. Demographic performance of a rare California endemic,Chorizanthe pungens var. hartwegiana(Polygonaceae).The American Midland Naturalist142, 244–256.
  • Doak DF, Morris W. 1999. Detecting population-level consequences of ongoing environmental change without long-term monitoring.Ecology80, 1537–1551.
  • Morris WF, Doak DF. 1998. Life history of the long-lived gynodioecious cushion plantSilene acaulis(Caryophyllaceae), inferred from size-based population projection matrices.American Journal of Botany85, 784–784.
  • Doak DF,Bigger D, Harding EK, Marvier MA, O'Malley RE, Thomson D. 1998. The Statistical Inevitability of Stability‐Diversity Relationships in Community Ecology.The American Naturalist151, 264–276.
  • Estes JA,Tinker MT, Williams TM, Doak DF. 1998. Killer whale predation on sea otters linking oceanic and nearshore ecosystems.Science282, 473–476.
  • Crooks KR,Sanjayan MA, Doak DF. 1998. New insights on cheetah conservation through demographic modeling.Conservation Biology12, 889–895.
  • Estes JA, Doak DF, Bodkin JR, Jameson RJ,Monson DH,Tinker MT. 1996. Comparative Demography of Sea Otter Populations.Endangered Species UPDATE13, 11–13.
  • Doak DF. 1995. Source‐sink models and the problem of habitat degradation: general models and applications to the Yellowstone grizzly.Conservation Biology9, 1370–1379.
  • Doak DF, Mills LS. 1994. A useful role for theory in conservation.Ecology75, 615–626.
  • Doak DF, Kareiva P,Klepetka B. 1994. Modeling population viability for the desert tortoise in the western Mojave Desert.Ecological Applications4, 446–460.
  • Mills LS, Soule ME, Doak DF. 1993. The Keystone-Species Concept in Ecology and Conservation.BioScience43, 219–224.
  • Harrison S, Stahl A, Doak DF. 1993. Spatial models and spotted owls: exploring some biological issues behind recent events.Conservation Biology7, 950–953.
  • Doak DF. 1992. Lifetime impacts of herbivory for a perennial plant.Ecology73, 2086–2099.
  • Doak DF. 1991. The consequences of herbivory for dwarf fireweed: Different time scales, different morphologial scales.Ecology72, 1397–1407.
  • Doak DF. 1989. Spotted owls and old growth logging in the Pacific Northwest.Conservation Biology3, 389-396.